Filed Under Native Americans

The Division of Fort Hall: Allotment and Land Loss

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, most Americans believed that the best way to help Native Americans was through forced assimilation. Laws and social activists worked to inhibit traditional culture and practices. Allotment was one such attempt to split Shoshone-Bannock land holdings and fracture their culture.

After the Native Americans were forced onto reservations, the U.S. Congress was concerned that most tribes had not discontinued collective living. In response, the Dawes Act was passed in 1887 to “allot” reservation lands to individual owners. This meant that the reservations would be divided among the tribe members so that necessity would require them to adopt agriculture. Each reservation was thus partitioned, including Fort Hall.

In 1868, Fort Hall was comprised of 1.8 million acres for approximately 4,500 residents. Between 1888 and 1902, the Shoshone-Bannock were pressured to cede away nearly a third of the reservation to the growing town of Pocatello. With the remaining land, each tribe member would receive a certain share. Married couples received 160 acres, single adults 80 acres, and children 40 acres. All of the “excess” was sold by the government. Before any of this could happen, the Shoshone-Bannock requested that all properties have access to irrigation. The first of the irrigation projects was completed in 1911. Between 1911 and 1913, half a million acres were allotted to Shoshone-Bannock tribe members. The remaining 600,000 acres were subsequently sold to non-Natives for a fraction of their worth.

Land allotment was divisive in its implementation, but the controversy surrounding the policy has not disappeared in the intervening century. For some, division of tribal lands into individual allotments was an unmitigated economic disaster. Thrown into the turbulence of crop prices and agriculture, many either went hungry or had to sell their land. For another segment of the population, allotment proved an opportunity to successfully experiment with ranching and farming. Local newspapers tended to exaggerate the truth with regards to both the successes and failures of allotment, so it is difficult to reach a historical consensus.

Today, 97 percent of Fort Hall is under the control of the tribe or individual Shoshone-Bannock owners. These lands are farmed individually or rented out to local farmers.


Idaho Indian Reservations 1896
Idaho Indian Reservations 1896 This 1896 map of Idaho’s Indian Reservations identifies the reservations in pink. Fort Hall, in the bottom left quadrant, was the largest of those reservations. Source: Annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, Vol 18., Part 2, 1895.
Map of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation in Idaho<br />
Map of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation in Idaho
By 1930, the original size of Fort Hall had been cut in half due to forced cessions and the sale of allotted lands to non-Natives. Source: Department of the Interior, Office of Indian Affairs, from the National Archives Catalog. “Map of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation in Idaho,” available at
Fort Hall Indians September 1940 Front Cover
Fort Hall Indians September 1940 Front Cover Land continued to be important in Shoshone-Bannock culture long after allotment ended. This September 1940 issue of the reservation newsletter depicts a Shoshone-Bannock farmer. Source: Special Collections, Idaho State University
Opening of the Fort Hall Reservation
Opening of the Fort Hall Reservation Frequent newspaper advertisements like this announced the survey and sale of “Indian land” on Fort Hall. Source: The Idaho News. “Opening of the Fort Hall Reservation,” 3 October, 1891.



Natalie Larsen, Brigham Young University, “The Division of Fort Hall: Allotment and Land Loss,” Intermountain Histories, accessed June 23, 2024,